Besides your standardchocolate chip, you’re free to find flavors from big and small brands.

Some cookies made me want to take second and third bites, while others confused me.

Thesesugar cookiescame in a classic log-shaped format.

Four different varieties of ready-to-bake cookie doughs against a colorful background

Photos: The brands. Design: Eat This, Not That!

Without any toppings, they looked pretty boring.

The taste:The sugar cookies were very brittle and crunchy.

They had a buttery flavor and seemed to dissolve in your mouth when you bit in.

a sugar cookie on a printed plate.

Photo: Ronnie Koenig, Eat This, Not That!

Even with decorations, these would not be cookies I’d want to eat again.

This item was priced at $7.99.

The chocolate chunks were different sizessome looked like chips, while others looked like rectangles.

immaculate brand cookie on a printed plate.

Photo: Ronnie Koenig, Eat This, Not That!

They also had the biggest price tag at $8.99, which made my eyes get round.

The look:These ginormous cookies had a weird grayish color after being baked.

When I broke one apartone serving is half a cookie!there was a nice ooey-gooey chocolate pull.

miss jones brand cookie on a printed plate.

Photo: Ronnie Koenig, Eat This, Not That!

The taste:These cookies had a strange, synthetic taste to them.

They were also unnecessarily big.

It was too much of a not-so-good thing.

Sweet Loren fudge cookie on a plate.

Photo: Ronnie Koenig/Eat This, Not That!

The look:These cookies had a very cake-like appearance.

They were round and dark in colorso much so that it was hard to see the chips!

The taste:These cookies were reminiscent of brownies but had a metallic aftertaste.

pillsbury cookie on a printed plate.

Photo: Ronnie Koenig, Eat This, Not That!

If you might eat the usual cookie ingredients, there’s no reason to buy this.

The look:These cookies baked up golden brown.

They were small, with few visible chocolate chips.

nestle m and m cookie on a printed plate.

Photo: Ronnie Koenig, Eat This, Not That!

Also, they baked up too thin and crunchy (and small) for my liking.

They come 20 to a package and cost me $4.49.

The look:The mini M&Ms made these cookies look fun, colorful, and exciting.

eat pastry brand cookie on a printed plate.

Photo: Ronnie Koenig, Eat This, Not That!

They baked up thin and had a tan base color.

The taste:Thin and crispy, this dough was fine and not overly sweet.

The M&M’s were a plus, but the dough lacked sweetness and flavor.

nestle cookie on a printed plate.

Photo: Ronnie Koenig, Eat This, Not That!

Rating:5/10

EatPastry Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip

EatPastry’s cookie doughcomes in a container and is vegan.

This one was priced at $5.49.

I did not see a lot of chips.

trader joe’s cookie on a printed plate.

Photo: Ronnie Koenig, Eat This, Not That!

The peanut butter was delicious without being overwhelmingit tasted like a cookie, not a gob of peanut butter.

My only criticism would be that they needed more chocolate chips!

For $4.49, they can be yours to bake.

The taste:These cookies were crunchy on the outside and chewy inside.

They had just the right amount of chips (a lot of them!)

and the dough was sweet but not overly soreally great.

The taste:Trader Joe’s has done it again.

I would pick up this cookie dough over any classic cookie brands.

The dough was perfect, the chips were plentiful, and the whole thing melded into one sweet bite.

Just add a glass of milk!